Thursday, August 23, 2012

I'm Just Wild

Okay, so the fun-loving Prince Harry got caught on camera wagging his willie and the world has gone stark raving buggers about it. I for one, don't see what the big deal is. He's got all the requisite equipment, same as any other guy. Are we all supposed to be aghast at this? It's not like he was having himself a jolly good wank in the middle of Piccadilly Circus, for crying out loud. Or strolling naked along the French Riviera. In those places one would expect to have one's photo taken.

But that was not the case, was it? No, he was in his own hotel suite with people he thought were his trusted friends; where he had every due expectation of privacy.
Personally, I say good for him for having a good time, he was on holiday after all! He's got nothing to be ashamed of, nothing to apologize for. The Palace needs to shrug this one off. After all, it was in London, 1979, on BBC where I got to see full-frontal male nudity on broadcast telly, in the form of Michael York. I agree with The Sliver Fox himself, Anderson Cooper. The Coop stated on AC360 last night, the person who took the video/snapshots should be ashamed of themselves for selling to the highest bidder, and TMZ should release the seller's name to the world so everyone will know the lack of integrity that person has.
We should all get over this need to put the male body in the shameful category. Why are men supposed to do anything possible to hide the package?


What's to be ashamed of? This?

or perhaps, these?

Or, maybe it's because they do this?
or because sometimes they do this?
Or this?
...sigh... Only in the US do we make such a fuss over seeing one of the most beautiful things nature ever gave to the world:


tedew said...

Exactly ...
Harry was in private and doing no harm. He's young, he's randy and he's hot. He was just having fun and it's become expected of him. So far the "Firm" seems to be shrugging it off and telling the British press to lay off.

This situation is sort of similar to when Michael Phelps was "exposed" by a friend with a bong. But that was more annoying because so many seem so eager to tear their heroes down; even that red neck sheriff who wanted to throw him in jail and melt down the key.

The only thing here is is that Harry's handlers could/should have been more on top of the situation.


The male nude body is a thing of beauty, especially that of some men, who are born that way. So the Prince has a cock and balls! So what!
A great post again of wonderful men and fantastic cocks! VIVE LE COCK!

Queer Heaven said...

I agree with everything you said.
He was just having a relaxing time in a VIP suite.
The real problem is those who were supposed to be his guards. How could they let someone take those photos and Harry's so called friend to sell them? Isn't the Prince allowed a little private time? I wonder if this friend would have snapped a photo if Harry had been wanking off?

whkattk said...

@ tedew - Good to hear the official stance is "lay off." Handlers... well, yes, perhaps they should have confiscated cameras and cell phones. Maybe they will now!

whkattk said...

@ LP - Yes, my liege, some are born more beautiful than others, 'tis true... Some cocks are more beautiful than others... but, we all have them and they are all beautiful in their own way!

whkattk said...

@ QH - If he'd been jerking off in front of them, whoever this "friend" is, I'm sure photos of THAT would be racing around the internet too. I hope in the future, his bodyguards (or whatever they're called) will confiscate all cameras and cell phones upon entering the suite.

Anonymous said...

Totally agree. Harry was on private time. He has a right to do what he wants, within reason. Getting naked with his friends is within reason. The guy is what - 27? He's doing what most 27 years old unmarried males do. I say good for Harry.

I suggest the people who are so critical of him for this are just jealous.

Ata boy Harry. We love ya and admire the fact you have some balls.