"Oh, My. God, Ethel!!! Ethel!! Captain America has a dick. A dick!! And, holy shit, he's got a set of balls, too. Ethel, can you believe that?"
I heard about the Chris Evans naked photo, but I haven't seen it. Now there's a real one out there among all the fakes. No one is really sure if it was a mistake or purposefully done. I rather would like to think he did it on purpose.
The idea that we have to be embarrassed and hide our cocks is ludicrous. The male anatomy is the male anatomy. It's there. We all know it's there. We all know how it functions.
As Faithful Reader Jean has pointed out: It's how we all got here.
It should be celebrated.
You've got nothing to be ashamed of and every reason to be proud.
14 comments:
Absolutely 100% correct!
I hope you are well!
I don't know how, but I never tire of see a nice dick pic. Here here Pat!!!!!
AMEN! Preach it Brother! Just Nature - the way we are so no need for all this OMG! Foolishness. Thanks for reminding us. Maybe one day society will get real. Wishing you all the very best, my Friend. Hugs, Licks, and Strokes, AOM
#1 He's Topher Di Maggio here on my blog
You preach to a convert.
I don't understand why there are still so many people who need that we explain that to them.
Well done not to be discouraged.
Hugs and bisous, my darlings Jean and Pat.
Oh, he can be proud of his.
Even if that’s not a pic of his dick, as you say, he should be proud of it.
Every boner is a blessing, remember?
And could I have that redhead, please?
I’d like him to take care of this tingle.
XoXo
Revealing parts of the human anatomy associated with sexual expression has been suppressed for a long time in order to reduce that expression, IMO. The Victorian era in particular suppressed sexuality except behind closed doors.
I'm not sure where it originated, however I note that more recently the womens movement has become increasingly vocal about harassment to the point that they believe no woman should be exposed to male sexuality except when they want it (including offense at "manspreading", male masturbation or being "raped" by a man's eyes). If women are being offended by mere symbology, then male nakedness or even its suggestion must certainly not be allowed (except when they want it). It would not surprise me if Queen Victoria was offended by male sexuality, except in circumstances of her own choosing, and the current situation has developed from there.
The natural world is replete with sexual harassment of females by males due to male sexual drive through testosterone. However, in an evolved species such as humans, we can moderate our impulses to a degree to take into consideration the comfort of others. The dilemma that no-one really talks about is that the male sexual drive still exists and suppression takes a toll. The obvious solution is to facilitate male sexual expression whilst excluding women who are offended by it: a satisfactory resolution needs to be developed.
I am bemused by the recent increase in sexual harassment claims in the workplace because putting men and women together will obviously create sexual tension due to male sex drive. What is incredible to me is that despite being harassed, women continue to use makeup and wear attractive clothing in the workplace in an unconscious effort to attract male attention.
But getting back to men being proud of what they have, sexual competition still exists even if we do not openly acknowledge it and I believe that genitalia size is still a factor at some level in this competition (it still is for women). Consequently, it is easier to have pride in one's manhood if one can more readily "compete". I would suggest that Chris Evans would not openly reveal himself if he felt he couldn't compete. The ongoing influence of size will not disappear until sexual competition is out of the equation and men can more readily obtain the sexual fulfilment they are driven to, IMO.
When you have a fundamental biological drive, it's not practical to suppress it over the long term: one must find an outlet for it.
You make a good point, there are a lot more nude pictures of women than there are men. Hugs and bisous.
Well, it's damned early here (03:20am).
I was awakened just after midnight by my horny husband playing with my balls....he said since it is now the 15th he wanted to get our Buddy Ball Checks done. We can now put 2 Happy Face stickers on the calendar.
Don't forget...check them!
@ Bruce - You and Bryn are the most faithful when it comes to the Ball Check! Bravo!
BTW - Has anyone ever asked what those "Happy Faces" on your calendar mean?
I really appreciate the variety and the realness of the men you choose to share on your blog! Thanks for representing!
Further to my comment about female suppression of male sexuality for their own comfort, instead of facilitating greater freedom of expression of the powerful male sexual drive, the obvious solution is to encourage greater male sexual expression with other men and leave women to their games.
When I see the playfulness between men in the sports arena, where it seems to be acceptable to express male affection, it doesn't take much imagination to extend it just a little into intimacy: it could be viewed as simply one man helping another. However, the existing taboos against male intimacy need to be abandoned. Homosexuality is still not readily accepted by many as a valid expression, merely tolerated and being considered gay is still a negative.
By extending male sexual expression to both genders, men have more choice and less need to be competitive, which might also have benefits in reducing the barriers to being proud of what they have and obtaining better satisfaction because of similarity in desires.
The remaining problem is that it is difficult to negotiate sexual interest and reciprocal interest, because there are no commonly accepted flags for men. Indeed there is considerable risk still of a hostile reaction to expressing sexual interest between men if one of them is homophobic. Perhaps we need to go back to the days of bandannas and rings to signify interest, or at least come up with safer approaches or gestures that are universally understood.
There's always the question of consent. Sending your dick to random people is harassment. But it's irrelevant here, since apparently he put it on Instagram and immediately deleted it.
So, did Cap seduce our innocence?
@ Jean - You speak the truth. Hugs and bisous!
Post a Comment