Jack-off Health (Dangers??)
 |
| 1 |
If you ventured out to the website I linked to on Friday, you will have noticed they also have a list of Health Dangers of Masturbation. They listed four things. Three of which are correct: 1. Urethral damage from sounding toys. 2. Skin irritation (typically caused by a lack of lubricant). 3. Guilt (this is typically caused by religious beliefs, faulty sense of machismo ('real men' don't jack off, they get laid), or the ignorance of parents (which can usually be traced back to religion).
 |
| 2 |
The one thing I don't find a Health Danger is "delayed or retarded ejaculation," which they ironically list as a benefit as well. Many guys enjoy delaying ejaculation - in fact, masturbation methods used to delay cumming are purposely taught to men who suffer from premature ejaculation. Retarded ejaculation can become a problem - in as much as there may be times when you want to cum and face difficulty in doing so. But as long as you eventually do manage to get your rocks off, there are no danger signals in that.
 |
| 3 |
Difficulty in blasting the batter is far, far different from the total inability to cum. And I took the opportunity to leave a comment about it and requested they remove that from their list of Dangers.
 |
| 4 |
If you do not - cannot - cum, I suggest you hightail it to a urologist to be evaluated. It could be a number of things: Retrograde ejaculation (the semen it ejected backward into the bladder) - which does not pose health risks. Or, it could be a blockage of the prostate - which can pose health risks, because blockage is most likely caused by infection. Unattended, prostate infections can spread to the urinary tract and cause all manner of trouble.
 |
| 5 |
We shall keep an eye on the site to see if they respond to my comment with arguments, or if they either clarify the statement or remove it. In the meantime, folks, remember to whack off at least twice per week - in addition to any other sexual activity based orgasms you manage.
 |
| 6 |
 |
| 7 |
 |
| 8 |
 |
| 9 |
 |
| 10 |
 |
| 11 |
 |
| 12 |
8 comments:
100 % okay as regards the religious faiths. I remember a friend who destroyed his magnificent blog because of them. Thanks to God (lol), he recreated a new blog.
I do not believe in gods, and I am proud and happy of that, but I respect those who have not enough strength to live without an imaginary creature innvented by the men who holds them by the hand and the testicles so as to lead them in nowhere.
What has no thanks to my mind are the religions and their delirious inventions, to beging by the gods.
Have a wondrous day and lots of bisous, my dear friend.
yes, 2x a week at the very minimum!
you always have the best advice in information thank you. Oh and sorry i've been MIA things here have been crazy
Masturbation is normal and healthy. Religious bigots condemn it because they do it too.
If I ejaculated twice a week I would be living in such an erotically discharged state! I'm 71 and masturbate a lot, but try and ejaculate only every 3 weeks or so to keep my erotic charge high. I think every man has to listen to his body and follow its advice. Don't be upset if that means stopping short of shooting as your body ages.
@ Fullmoonma - Masturbating - like any other sexual activity - doesn't always have to end in ejaculation. But, I wonder if you are denying yourself pleasure. Cumming does not have to mean a total discharge of your erotic state - it usually makes one enter an erotic euphoria; one that can begin another build-up immediately resulting in a constant state of sexual excitement.
@ becca - Hey, sweet girl! I understand completely - but it sure is good to have you stop by!!
@ Nautical Starr - Yes, they do; in spite of the fact. Sad for them - and even sadder for those who believe them.
Post a Comment