The differing opinions on circumcision can become quite heated. Which is why I generally shy away from posts on the topic. In last week's post, Muscle or Organ, a study was cited by the author of the article I quoted. Two Faithful Readers disagreed. One chastised me for even quoting that [portion of the] article, the other sent in the following rebuttal: Anatomy of the Penis: Penile and Foreskin Neurology done by Ken McGrath, who, given his credentials, would know what he's talking about.
Make no mistake, I appreciate all the comments and emails I get. Each and every one brings value to the proverbial table.
Whatever your own situation, I hope you have learned to care for and enjoy what you've got.
14 comments:
Absolutely!
Dr. McGrath makes a great case for foreskin, though. I've had men both circumcised and uncircumcised and I like them both. Obviously, circumcised may have less sensitivity in the glans, but it's still quite pleasurable. I've heard of men going the extra mile to recover part of that tissue, too.
XOXO
My penis is a crew neck instead of a turtle neck. They are all different but fun to play with in their own ways. Enjoyed hearing the gentlemen speak on the video. Thanks for all the work you do to enlighten your readers. Viva la difference!
If there was a problem about the fact of being circumcised or not, it would have to be solved one or another of the fifteenths of the month when you invite us to practice a check up.
There is at least one advantage to not being circumcised and that is that one can get circumcised more easily than having a foreskin grafted.
Hugs and bisous, my darlings Jean and Pat.
Have a great day.
@ Six - The thing is, they don't actually recover the foreskin, they are stretching out what is left.
@ Hooter - That sounds like mine. There's a bit of gathering skin under the head but nothing covers it. I never got an explanation as to why my (older) brother is intact while i am not. "We don't talk about those things. You'll understand when you're older." Were other issues discovered as a newborn that required the cut? I don't know.
@ MFP - That's for sure. It grafts were possible, there'd be a line out the doors of the urological surgical clinics. Hugs and bisous.
@ Hooter - At least doctors explained my tiny balls when I couldn't make babies... "Did you have Mumps when you were a kid?" Oh, man, did I!!! And Scarlet Fever very shortly after that. "Well, that's the reason for your tiny nuts. Your sperm count is damn near nil and what's there are badly deformed."
Cut...uncut...doesn't matter to me. I like the looks of both and the taste of both aint bad either. There'll beautiful to me. You did make me chuckle. And your right about this. This gets so heated and questioned which is right or bad. I swear, everything is a damn debate these days.
I say just enjoy.
The video is very interesting. Seems that men might wonder what goes into the decision making process of whether a male is circumcised or not. Who actually makes that decision. It amazingly has been a religious decision, a doctor's decision, a mother's decision, and may be a parents' decision.
But the answer all along should have been, no decision needs to be made. "Mother Nature," has had millions of years to figure out the best arrangement. Hugs and bisous.
All peens are beautiful. Especially peens seen. I don't get the controversy. Happy just to have a peen. It's one of my favorite things and I wouldn't trade it for the world.
I was circumcised as an adult out of necessity. I noticed pretty quickly the loss of sensitivity. Before I was cut, when I got a blowjob, the sensation was unbelievably strong and pleasant. After, it felt great to shoot, but the overall pleasure was much less.
love these pics
Thanks for hunting up the video of Dr McGraff and posting it.
Post a Comment