"Thank you for posting our question on Friday. The med the doctor proposed wasn't anti-depressents. He said he could lower my T which is high but not really that over the top. After my wife and me read the responses I think we're going to go back tot he doctor about the med you and the one commentor talked about. I mean as long as I can get a hard-on when we want it is what we are after. Thank you so much."
You're welcome! I have the best Readers. Related, but not related (I think) to your post.
"I don't think its the same dude who write in but I have a coworker who jacks off in the men's room every day. He was standing at a urinal mid-cum when I walked in the other day. He didn't seem embarrassed at all. He finished, I pissed. Even though my dick got a little hard and I know he noticed because he glanced at it, no comments passed between us. We washed our hands and left. But I sure wanted to say something. He's a really nice guy and I want to tell him I'd be willing to help him out anytime. What do you think?"
Just because he doesn't, doesn't mean it's okay for you to make a move.
As much as you might want to lend a hand (or a mouth),
I'm going to suggest you tamp down your interest - no matter how altruistic your intentions. If you can find a way outside of the workplace...maybe it would be okay. But, even then, he might still be able to lodge a complaint.
11 comments:
Good advice. Sex at work is a bad idea.
It's a shame the guy who witnessed a co-worker cumming in the men's room can't even give the cummer a wink, a thumbs-up, or otherwise acknowledge that he'd seen the cum and wasn't put off by it.
I think a quiet word ("Nice!") would seem to be OK, as long as the witness doesn't make a physical move.
Of course, things get sticky (!) if the two guys aren't the same level in the company hierarchy. Boss-to-Employee issues rear their complicated ugly head.
--PaulMmn
Beautiful pictures!!!
Just Sayin'
Hugs and bisous, my darlings Jean and Pat.
No no no. Like whkattk said... legal troubles.
Look at old movies/TV shows and the causal interaction, so much has changed. Now even just the perception you looked at someone wrong or stood too close can result in allegations. It's friggin stupid, but unfortunately that's the way it is.
It's a no.
A big no if HR gets a hint of it. Outside of work? Not a good idea either. Been there. Never doing it again.
XOXO
Yes. What would HR say? That's what you have to ask yourself every time you have a dilemma at work these days. The legal ramifications for your company directly impact your future employment. So look elsewhere, or find yourself hitting the pavement feet first. Good advice, Sir! Kizzes.
Good advice, just saying. Hugs and bisous.
That first photo is amazin'! 🔥
Btw, not sure doin' it at work is the best choice, or in public. I know for some, it's a turn-on because of the adrenaline & possibility to get caught but, it's not okay for others to catch you like that & it's against the law after all, so... 🤷♂️
HR will be your new best friend that may get you fired. Treat your co-workers like children; dont touch them.
It's kind of worrying that male sexual expression is being chilled as something unacceptable in many environments. We are still being influenced by entrenched homophobia within the male community itself, not to mention women being disgusted by normal male biology such as erections, masturbation and even sex which they feel is excessive (based on their own biology which is not the same as mens).
Whilst sexual expression in the work environment may be unacceptable, we should acknowledge that heterosexual attraction and flirting happens normally in those environments, even though it is as disruptive to the job at hand, yet is not deliberately impeded although sexual expression between men is. Sexuality is such a large part of our lives, we should not be surprised it happens everywhere, especially when the opportunities for sexual expression are so limited (especially with partners) to the bedroom.
If a man can't connect with other men in the work environment, what other opportunities does he have to do so outside of work? This is the reason sexual attraction and liaison happens so much through work, because men and women have a chance to meet and interact that is much more difficult to achieve elsewhere. Men are not encouraged to get together outside work, unless it is for an approved activity: there is no freedom still to get together to explore more intimate connection, whatever that happens to be, for its own sake.
In particular, men do not have a way to signal interest in exploring intimacy with each other and homophobia often gets in the way. Why can't we be comfortable in expressing appreciation about another man's physical appearance and take it as a compliment (and a possible overture to something more), without it threatening masculinity?
I remember the post about the Father who indirectly approached his masseur son about a happy ending, which was extremely difficult and uncomfortable for both, despite the masseur offering happy endings to his other male clients. I don't think this was just the usual Father-son interaction discomfort, but a reflection of the difficulty of men in general in approaching and interacting with other men at a more intimate level. I should imagine the masseur and his clients have difficulty in pursuing mutual intimate interaction too, because it's all become so bound up in legal restriction when it should simply be about free communication and consent.
I can totally understand that guy. I would have popped a boner as well, especially as I am almost always at least semi-hard when I need to pee. So if it is not appropriate to lend him a hand, have some fun of your own and stroke one out when you are standing near him. Perhaps he likes the view.
Post a Comment